The rest of the money, about $84 million, is projected savings flowing from those actions. For example, if a fraudulent provider has been billing Medicare for roughly $100 million a year for wheelchairs that patients never receive and they are kicked out of the program, officials estimated the program would save $100 million the next year.
Medicare has been a highly sensitive political issue for the Obama administration since Democrats lost the House in 2010, partly due to a backlash from seniors over program cuts to help finance the president's healthcare overhaul. Since then, top officials have emphasized the administration's stewardship of Medicare, touting better benefits and an all-out campaign against fraud.
Lawmakers from both parties, including Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, have pressed health officials for months to release results on the system, complaining that without data, there's no accountability for the money spent and the promises made.
The system's projected savings are only for one year, but anti-fraud administrator Peter Budetti noted the actual savings could be much more because a provider that has been banished from the program could have stayed in the system for years, racking up hundreds of millions of dollars in bad claims.
The bulk of the projected savings came in referrals to law enforcement that remain under investigation, but will likely result in payment suspensions or kicking providers out of the program. Federal health officials did not say how many cases were pending, but estimated about $68 million in potential savings in that category.
Federal health officials have struggled with how to measure the success of the Fraud Prevention System. In the past, it was measured by how much money law enforcement officials recovered. Now, it's based on how much money is saved before it's paid.
Data from the new system also launched 536 new investigations and provided information for another 511 already in progress, but it's unclear what actions had been taken based on those investigations.
"We have shown this technology can work in fighting healthcare fraud, and we have seen encouraging results. The system is designed to grow in sophistication and complexity, helping the government stay one step ahead of fraudsters," Budetti said.
The new screening technology, which was mandated by Congress, is housed in the Baltimore area in a $3.6 million command center.
In the past, investigators individually screened each claim as it came in, determining on face value whether it looked suspicious. Under the new system, claims are run through a series of sophisticated computer models that can spot suspicious billing patterns and put that claim in the context of all the claims from that provider and claims from other providers in a particular industry.
For example, does a storefront wheelchair retailer in Los Angeles, for example, have lots of customers in San Francisco, more than 350 miles away?