Clarity at last
Skip to main content
MDHC_Logotype_white
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • This Week's News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition
    • Ambulatory surgery centers offer extraordinary value in a high-cost healthcare system
      Ascension’s St. Mary’s Hospital Surgery Center at Towne Centre and Allegheny Health Network’s Bethel Park surgery center
      Hospitals see opportunity, risk in ambulatory surgery centers
      KPMG says deal activity will stay high in '21: 10 takeaways
      2 in 5 Americans live where COVID-19 strains hospital ICUs
    • KPMG says deal activity will stay high in '21: 10 takeaways
      2 in 5 Americans live where COVID-19 strains hospital ICUs
      Biden's early approach to virus: Underpromise, overdeliver
      A phone screen showing the question, "Mary we hope this information was helpful and we'd like to keep guiding you. Are you interested in knowing when it's your turn to receive the vaccine?"
      Chatbots, texting campaigns help manage influx of COVID vax questions
    • Ascension’s St. Mary’s Hospital Surgery Center at Towne Centre and Allegheny Health Network’s Bethel Park surgery center
      Hospitals see opportunity, risk in ambulatory surgery centers
      Health suffers as rural hospitals close
      Medicare ACO participants fell in 2021
      Louisiana gets reports vaccine providers are discriminating
    • Last-minute COVID costs cut into UnitedHealthcare's $396 million operating income
      CMS approves rule forcing insurers to ease prior authorization
      COVID-19 still a big uncertainty for insurers in 2021
      Health insurers' outlook boosted after Dems' Georgia win
    • It's a secret: California keeps key virus data from public
      lacewell_linda_supertinendent_dept_of_financial_services_8.47.jpg
      New York state investigates drug price spikes during pandemic
      Health experts blame rapid expansion for vaccine shortages
      HHS freezes rule targeting community health centers' drug discounts
    • KPMG says deal activity will stay high in '21: 10 takeaways
      By the Numbers: 20 largest healthcare investment banks in 2020
      Providers await new HHS coronavirus grant reporting deadline
      Operation Warp Speed Dr. Moncef Slaoui, Pfizer Group President Angela Hwang, Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, CVS Health Executive Vice President Karen Lynch and McKesson CEO Brian Tyler participate in a panel discussion on the COVID-19 vaccine.
      Hospitals, drug companies strive to stand out virtually at JPM
    • Dr. Karen DeSalvo
      Next Up Podcast: What to expect with telehealth and healthcare technology in the next 4 years
      Next Up Podcast: What to expect with telehealth and healthcare technology in the next 4 years - Transcript
      A man in a room with servers.
      Momentum grows to outsource hospital tech functions in 2021
      5 things to know about Google's $2.1B Fitbit acquisition
    • Avocado
      Avocado a day keeps the doctor away
      50% of Americans make resolutions. Fewer than 27% keep them over time.
      Data Points: Sticking with your resolutions
      An older man wearing a mask receiving a vaccine.
      Want more diversity in clinical trials? Start with the researchers
      U.K. chief scientist says new virus variant may be more deadly
    • Cerner names Erceg as new CFO
      Elizabeth Richter will serve as acting CMS administrator
      Providence names new chief financial officer
      Wisconsin's top health official departing for federal job
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • InDepth Special Reports
    • Innovations
    • The Affordable Care Act after 10 years
    • New care model helps primary-care practices treat obesity
      doctor with patient
      COVID-19 treatment protocol developed in the field helps patients recover
      Rachel Wyatt
      Project to curb pressure injuries in hospitals shows promise
      Yale New Haven's COVID-19 nurse-staffing model has long-term benefits
    • Michellene Davis
      Healthcare leadership lacks the racial diversity needed to reduce health disparities
      Dr. James Hildreth
      How medical education can help fight racism
      Modern Healthcare InDepth: Breaking the bias that impedes better healthcare
      Videos: Healthcare industry executives describe their encounters with racism
      Quotes from rebadged employees
      Outsourcing IT, revenue cycle takes toll on internal culture
    • A phone screen showing the question, "Mary we hope this information was helpful and we'd like to keep guiding you. Are you interested in knowing when it's your turn to receive the vaccine?"
      Chatbots, texting campaigns help manage influx of COVID vax questions
      A woman with a wearable sensor talking to her provider.
      Wearable sensors help diagnose heart rhythm problems in West Virginia
      self service station
      COVID-19 pushes patient expectations toward self-service
      Targeting high-risk cancer patients with genetics
  • Transformation
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Highmark Health inks six-year cloud, tech deal with Google
      Study: 1 in 5 patients report discrimination when getting healthcare
      HHS proposes changing HIPAA privacy rules
      Android health records app launches at 230 health systems
    • California hospitals prepare ethical protocol to prioritize lifesaving care
      Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, Berkshire Hathaway disband Haven
      Digital pathways poised to reshape healthcare continuum in 2021
      Healthcare was the hardest hit by supply shortages across all U.S. industries
    • A phone screen showing the question, "Mary we hope this information was helpful and we'd like to keep guiding you. Are you interested in knowing when it's your turn to receive the vaccine?"
      Chatbots, texting campaigns help manage influx of COVID vax questions
      A woman with a wearable sensor talking to her provider.
      Wearable sensors help diagnose heart rhythm problems in West Virginia
      New care model helps primary-care practices treat obesity
      How hospitals are building on COVID-19 telehealth momentum
    • Regional insurers bet big on virtual-first plans
      MedPAC votes to boost hospital payments, freeze or cut other providers
      Most Next Gen ACOs achieved bonuses in 2019
      Congress recalibrates Medicare Physician Fee Schedule after lobbying
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
    • Health Systems Financials
      Executive Compensation
      Physician Compensation
  • Op-Ed
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
    • Wellstar CEO calls adapting for the pandemic her bold move
      Howard P. Kern
      Recognizing the value of telehealth in its infancy
      Dr. Stephen Markovich
      A bold move helped take him from family doctor to OhioHealth CEO
      Dr. Bruce Siegel
      Why taking a hospital not-for-profit was Dr. Bruce Siegel’s boldest move
    • Barry Ostrowsky
      Ending racism is a journey taken together; the starting point must be now
      Laura Lee Hall and Gary Puckrein
      Increased flu vaccination has never been more important for communities of color
      John Daniels Jr.
      Health equity: Making the journey from buzzword to reality
      Mark C. Clement and David Cook
      We all need to 'do something' to fight inequities and get healthcare right, for every patient, every time
    • Ambulatory surgery centers offer extraordinary value in a high-cost healthcare system
       Alan B. Miller
      Looking ahead with optimism as we continue to transform healthcare
      Dr. Bruce Siegel
      By protecting the healthcare safety net, Biden can put us on the path to a stronger country
      Healing healthcare: some ideas for triage by the new Congress, administration
    • Letters: Eliminating bias in healthcare needs to be ‘deliberate and organic’
      Letters: Maybe dropping out of ACOs is a good thing for patients
      Letters: White House and Congress share blame for lack of national COVID strategy
      Letters: VA making strides to improve state veterans home inspections
    • Sponsored Content Provided By Optum
      How blockchain could ease frustration with the payment process
      Sponsored Content Provided By Optum
      Three steps to better data-sharing for payer and provider CIOs
      Sponsored Content Provided By Optum
      Reduce total cost of care: 6 reasons why providers and payers should tackle the challenge together
      Sponsored Content Provided By Optum
      Why CIOs went from back-office operators to mission-critical innovators
  • Awards
    • Award Programs
    • Nominate
    • Previous Award Programs
    • Other Award Programs
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare Logo for Navigation
      Nominations Open - Best Places to Work in Healthcare
      Nominations Open - Health Care Hall of Fame
      Nominations Open - 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Top 25 Minority Leaders
    • Top 25 Women Leaders
    • Excellence in Nursing Awards
    • Design Awards
    • Top 25 COOs in Healthcare
    • 100 Top Hospitals
    • ACHE Awards
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Webinars
    • COVID-19 Event Tracker
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Healthcare Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Workplace of the Future Conference
    • Strategic Marketing Conference
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Minority Leaders Gala (2022)
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
  • Listen
    • Podcast - Next Up
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Dr. Karen DeSalvo
      Next Up Podcast: What to expect with telehealth and healthcare technology in the next 4 years
      Carter Dredge
      Next Up Podcast: Ready, set, innovate! Innovation and disruption in healthcare
      Next Up Podcast: COVID-19, social determinants highlight health inequities — what next?
      Ceci Connolly
      Next Up Podcast: How to navigate the murky post-election waters
    • Beyond the Byline: Regulators aim to boost value push with fraud and abuse law updates
      An older man wearing a mask receiving a vaccine.
      Beyond the Byline: Verifying information on the chaotic COVID-19 vaccine rollout
      doctor burnout
      Beyond the Byline: How healthcare supply chain struggles contribute to employee burnout
      Beyond the Byline: Covering race and diversity in the healthcare industry
    • Leading intention promote diversity and inclusion
      Introducing Healthcare Insider Podcast
    • The Check Up: Chip Kahn
      The Check Up: Chip Kahn of the Federation of American Hospitals
      The Check Up: Trenda Ray
      The Check Up: Trenda Ray of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
      The Check Up: Dr. Kenneth Davis
      The Check Up: Dr. Kenneth Davis of Mount Sinai Health System
      The Check Up: Dr. Thomas McGinn
      The Check Up: Dr. Thomas McGinn of CommonSpirit Health
    • Video: Ivana Naeymi Rad of Intelligent Medical Objects
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
June 30, 2012 01:00 AM

Clarity at last

Providers welcome justices' long-awaited ACA ruling, will focus now on implementing law

Joe Carlson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    Obama welcomed the Supreme Court's decision on the healthcare law, as the ruling affirmed the central legislative achievement of his presidency.

    Declaring it was not his job to protect Americans from the consequences of their political choices, Chief Justice John Roberts cast his lot with the U.S. Supreme Court's liberal wing and voted to uphold most of the healthcare reform law.

    “Members of this court are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments,” Roberts wrote. “Those decisions are entrusted to our nation's elected leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with them.”

    The outcome finally clears the way for a wave of implementation goals in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, whose effects will ripple across the nation's $2.7 trillion healthcare industry for years to come.

    All 50 states will see the establishment of a public insurance exchange, up to 32 million more Americans are projected to receive coverage, and every hospital and doctor in the nation will face financial penalties if they fail to meet goals for quality of care and patient safety. Under the individual mandate, which threatened to sink the law before the Supreme Court upheld it, virtually every American will be required to obtain health insurance or face penalties on their income taxes after 2014.

    The effect of the Medicaid ruling

    The most immediate question in many minds was whether the one aspect of the court's ruling that went against the Obama administration's wishes—striking down the huge financial penalties for states that don't expand their Medicaid programs—will affect insurance coverage estimates.

    The court's decision left providers wondering which states would choose to opt out of the Medicaid expansion, which could work against the reform law's stated goal of using the joint federal-state program to cover low-income uninsured Americans. Twenty-six state governments sued to stop the law, though experts noted that citizens in states that opt out will still pay federal taxes to support the expanded Medicaid program elsewhere.

    Despite that uncertainty, healthcare players cheered the results of the high court's six opinions on June 28. The opinions spanned 193 pages, upholding the individual insurance mandate while reflecting a deeply fractured court.

    Many observers predicted the outcome, but few foresaw the unusual legal route to the critical decision to toss aside the Obama administration's claim that the mandate was an extension of Congress' power to regulate commerce—but then declare it legal anyway, as a tax on the uninsured in a 5-4 vote.

    Related Content

    Frontlines: What the executives were saying

    Market bump

    Complete reform coverage

    The court also upheld the ability of states to receive enhanced federal funds to expand their eligibility criteria for Medicaid. But a 7-2 majority of the court struck down the corollary provision in the law that sought to allow HHS to cut off all federal Medicaid funding for failing to expand the program to cover the uninsured. States typically receive about 10% of their entire revenue for the year from federal Medicaid grants.

    The highly anticipated ruling triggered a cascade of reaction across the country, with hospital groups and insurers praising the decision for bringing stability and certainty and Republican leaders vowing to turn the November elections into a referendum on the law.

    “I sure am glad to have the ruling and be on the other side of all that anticipation, but we still have a lot of work to do,” said Richard Umbdenstock, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association, which supported the law. “We are among the first ones to say it's not a perfect bill, and we will look for opportunities to help improve it or address those subjects that weren't dealt with in the bill.”

    Well on the way

    Healthcare industry experts said many providers and payers are well on their way to achieving the many objectives set out in the law, including reducing preventable readmissions, coordinating primary and acute care, encouraging preventive services, accepting bundled and value-based payments and managing population health.

    Hugh Greene, CEO of three-hospital Baptist Health in Jacksonville, Fla., said he has spoken frequently of the need for those kinds of delivery-system reforms even in a state such as Florida, which was the lead state plaintiff in the Supreme Court case to strike down the law.

    “The two fundamental drivers of reform—the number of uninsured and costs rising dramatically—would not have gone away if the law was struck down,” Greene said. “I'm also not naive, this is not the final decision. There is a sense that this could go back into the political process as well, and the possibility that repeal of the law could occur. But this is a positive development that gives us clarity going forward.”

    The 906-page reform law famously passed both houses of Congress in late 2009 and early 2010 without a single Republican vote in favor of the final bill, and the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling upholding the mandate landed with a presidential election four months away.

    Minutes after the decision was announced, Republican officials vowed to turn the November elections into a referendum on the law and scheduled plans for a House vote to repeal the law July 11.

    “The decision today really indicates we have entered an age in which the government—Washington—will be controlling healthcare, unless something changes,” Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said at a news conference after the decision.

    Despite the tenor of such political rhetoric, Iowa Health System President and CEO Bill Leaver said many Republicans actually support the healthcare delivery reforms embodied in the law, even if they don't say so when the media are nearby.

    That's why Leaver doubted that Congress would try to undo all the manifold provisions in the law that are intended to make the delivery system more efficient and accountable to patients.

    'Their only option'

    “I would think they would not try to do much about the ACO-type provisions, because really, that's their only option right now to try to reduce Medicare spending,” Leaver said, referring to the law's push for Medicare accountable care organizations.

    Iowa Health owns Trinity Regional Medical Center, Fort Dodge, Iowa, which is participating in one of the CMS' 32 Medicare Pioneer ACOs. The Des Moines-based system has also announced plans to form an ACO with Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa. Scores of systems around the country are doing the same.

    Insurers, meanwhile, pledged to start an immediate lobbying campaign to make adjustments to the law to prevent higher premiums from undoing coverage projections.

    Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, said provisions in the law that have received little attention so far—such as a tax on commercial premiums and the requirement that young beneficiaries can pay only three times less than the oldest—could raise insurance costs by up to 15%, according to some analyses. “The court settled the issue of whether we will have universal coverage,” Ignagni said. “Now the question is, will people buy insurance?”

    Enough to offset costs?

    Dr. Alan Muney, chief medical officer for Cigna Corp., said it still isn't clear whether the increase in healthy people who have to buy insurance will contribute enough to insurers' risk pools to offset the costs of having to offer care to older and sicker patients who are more likely to see their doctor or go to the hospital. That math was particularly uncertain in light of the court's ruling on Medicaid.

    The law also forces insurers to limit the amount they spend on administrative overhead to 20% of what they collect for beneficiaries' healthcare and return any surpluses to consumers and businesses—a provision expected to cause rebates of about $1.1 billion by Aug. 1. But Muney said upholding the law's 80/20 medical-loss ratio is manageable.

    “We need to lower the administrative costs of providing care, and we need to lower the cost of the care itself,” he said. “We need to provide care in the right amount at the right time. Right now there is too little, too late, and too much, too often very frequently. In a way, the MLR provisions are a workaround to what we are driving to anyway, which is higher value and lower cost.”

    In its legal reasoning, the Supreme Court reached answers to the law's two main controversies in ways other federal circuit courts hadn't.

    Raising taxes

    Most glaringly, the court struck down the sanction that faced any state that didn't agree to expand its Medicaid program, ruling such a bargain as tantamount to coercion. No other court, not even the District Court judge in Pensacola, Fla., who struck down the entire act and launched the case that went to Washington, found the Medicaid provisions unconstitutional.

    With the insurance mandate, Roberts and the liberal-leaning justices upheld it on the grounds that it was an exercise of Congress' power to tax under the Constitution. Neither of the federal appeals courts in Cincinnati or Washington that ruled the mandate legal did so on those grounds.

    But observers said that by ruling that way on the mandate, Roberts achieved two goals. First, he avoided a party-line split on a major national controversy, while also not granting the expansion of congressional power that many conservatives and libertarians have railed against.

    “Even if Congress lacks the power to direct individuals to buy insurance, the only effect of the individual mandate is to raise taxes on those who do not do so, and thus the law may be upheld as a tax,” Roberts' wrote for the majority.

    M. Miller Baker, a constitutional law and appellate court attorney with McDermott Will & Emery in Washington, said virtually no one could have foreseen Roberts' ruling.

    “The shocker here is that there were five votes to sustain this on the taxing power,” Baker said. “Congress over and over went out of its way to say this is not a tax, and the president himself said it wasn't a tax. And now it's being upheld as a tax.”

    Indeed, staunch reform law opponent Ken Cuccinelli, the attorney general of Virginia who filed his own unsuccessful court challenge, noted that as a political “silver lining” of the ruling.

    “Those who support this law and who voted for it are now and forever on record for supporting this tax increase—a position they refused to admit when passing the bill,” Cuccinelli said in a written statement.

    Cuccinelli also said the opinion represented the first time since the 1930s-era New Deal that the court had imposed any limit on congressional power under the Constitution's commerce clause.

    Indeed, Roberts' opinion opened with a preamble describing a kind of deep national and institutional soul-searching that the healthcare law had provoked, framing the ruling's constitutional context in terms of the sweeping powers of states to police their citizens, as compared to the limited powers of the federal government enumerated in the Constitution.

    Yet the decision reached a conclusion that is anathema to many proponents of individual liberties and limited federal powers: that the federal government has the power to cajole some people to buy a private product.

    “Simply put, Congress may tax and spend,” Roberts wrote. “This grant gives the federal government considerable influence even in areas where it cannot directly regulate."

    “I have scheduled a vote for total repeal of the Obamacare bill to occur on Wednesday, July 11,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said after the ruling.

    Sharing responsibility

    The irony is that Obama never wanted the insurance mandate in the first place.

    He opposed it on the campaign trail in 2008, even though the bill he signed on March 23, 2010, included it as a financial offset to other provisions in the sprawling law.

    Principally, the reform law forces insurance companies to offer policies to nearly anyone with little regard to timing, and it greatly limits the amount they can raise premiums on sick people—the provisions known as “guaranteed issue” and “community rating.”

    For hospitals, the law also reduced growth in future Medicare rates by about $155 billion over 10 years.

    The coverage mandate for virtually any American who wasn't in prison or religiously opposed to insurance is intended to shore up the insurers' risk pools while also decreasing the $43 billion in uncompensated costs that hospitals absorbed in 2008.

    Weighing the costs

    Even with the mandate's legality firmly established, industry officials say it's not clear that it makes up for the costs imposed by the law's other provisions.

    “The cuts have started, and the coverage has yet to kick in,” Umbdenstock noted. “We've seen various analyses; some that say we come up short and some that say that by the end of the decade, hospitals make back more than that. I think, frankly, a decade is a long time.”

    Congress estimated that about 4 million people are likely to pay the penalties rather than obtain insurance.

    The “shared responsibility payment” increases in the first few years of the law, leveling out in 2016 at 2.5% of any household's income. However, the penalty is also set at no less than $695, and no more than the average annual insurance premium for six specific services such as prescription drugs and hospitalization.

    Michael Dowling, president and CEO of North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Great Neck, N.Y., said healthcare providers are working to reduce costs, eliminate inefficiencies and become more responsible for patient outcomes. The efforts didn't begin with the law, he said, and they will continue regardless of what happens in the November elections.

    “I don't think we can allow the confusion to sway us,” Dowling said. “I think the people who are out there on the front lines delivering healthcare have to be the reformers.”

    TAKEAWAY: The court delivers clarity by upholding reform and its mandate for individuals to buy health insurance, but raises some uncertainty with the law's Medicaid expansion.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    It's a secret: California keeps key virus data from public
    It's a secret: California keeps key virus data from public
    New York state investigates drug price spikes during pandemic
    New York state investigates drug price spikes during pandemic
    Sponsored Content
    Get Free Newsletters

    Sign up for free enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today

    The weekly magazine, websites, research and databases provide a powerful and all-encompassing industry presence. We help you make informed business decisions and lead your organizations to success.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Instagram

    Stay Connected

    Join the conversation with Modern Healthcare through our social media pages

    MDHC_Logotype_white
    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2021. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • This Week's News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • InDepth Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Transformation
      • Patients
      • Operations
      • Care Delivery
      • Payment
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Op-Ed
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Awards
      • Award Programs
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Top 25 Minority Leaders
        • Top 25 Women Leaders
      • Nominate
      • Previous Award Programs
        • Excellence in Nursing Awards
        • Design Awards
        • Top 25 COOs in Healthcare
      • Other Award Programs
        • 100 Top Hospitals
        • ACHE Awards
    • Events
      • Conferences
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Healthcare Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
        • Workplace of the Future Conference
        • Strategic Marketing Conference
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Minority Leaders Gala (2022)
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Webinars
      • COVID-19 Event Tracker
    • Listen
      • Podcast - Next Up
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing