Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
June 30, 2012 12:00 AM

'A big issue'

Providers grapple with Medicaid provision

Rich Daly and Jessica Zigmond
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi reacts after the Supreme Court's decision. The state's GOP governor, Rick Scott, said he would oppose the law's implementation.

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold most of the healthcare reform law lifted the cloud of uncertainty hanging over many providers, but those that treat large numbers of Medicaid patients struggled to understand the full extent of its impact on them.

    The court ruled that the federal government may not threaten to cut off all Medicaid funding for states that do not expand their programs' eligibility to all residents whose income is up to 133% of the federal poverty level. That opens the possibility that some states will not undertake an expansion that was expected to add at least 16 million new enrollees to the shared federal-state insurance program for the poor and seriously ill.

    Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.), co-chairman of the GOP Doctors Caucus, said he expected his state to be among those that refuse to undertake the expansion because of cost concerns.

    Public hospital representatives voiced concern that the ruling could stymie the Medicaid expansion that is essential to safety net hospitals.

    “We're still studying it; we think it may be a big issue,” said Dr. Bruce Siegel, president and CEO of the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. “At first read, it seems to give the states the ability not to do the expansion.”

    Siegel said states with conservative leadership and a general opposition to the ACA and federal funding are more likely to not expand their Medicaid programs.

    Indeed, immediately after the ruling, several GOP governors, including those of Arizona, Florida and Texas, slammed the decision and suggested that they would oppose its implementation.

    Before enactment of the law, the cost of Medicaid was split between states and the federal government. The federal government covered an average of 57% of the cost, according to the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act expanded the federal share to the full cost from 2014 to 2016 of new beneficiaries enrolled under the new income-related requirement. After that, the federal share will decline gradually to 90% in 2020 and thereafter.

    Hospital advocates and some members of Congress highlighted the double impact on hospitals of the Medicaid component of the court's decision, which could result in both reducing the number of Medicaid-covered patients hospitals treat and retaining disproportionate-share hospital program payment cuts that were instituted to pay for that coverage expansion.

    “Their poor population might be much worse off as a consequence of the ruling that was handed down today,” Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas) said in an interview. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he plans to hold hearings in the coming weeks to better understand the effects of the Medicaid ruling.

    But not all hospitals were concerned about the Medicaid provision of the ruling. For instance, Michael Connelly, president and CEO of Catholic Health Partners, a Cincinnati-based health system, described the Medicaid provision as “creating a nice balance between the rights of the states and the federal government.”

    Many Democrats said they were confident states would pursue voluntarily the Medicaid expansion, given the high federal match.

    Related Content

    Clarity at last

    Market bump

    Frontlines: What the executives were saying

    Ahead of the game

    Complete reform coverage

    The court “did conclude that no state could lose all of its funds for its current Medicaid program if it chose not to select this option,” Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), ranking Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a statement. “But the major point is that 100% federal funding remains available to assist states in providing this coverage, and states will seize the opportunity to do so.”

    Connelly doubted the contention of the law's supporters that the Medicaid expansion would lessen the extent of emergency department crowding and indigent care that hospitals have struggled with. Even if every state expanded their Medicaid program eligibility, he said, the low physician reimbursement rates most use would keep many of the newly covered from finding care alternatives to hospital emergency departments.

    Emergency department visits increased 1.9% annually from 2001 to 2008, according to a June study in the Annals of Emergency Medicine. Reducing the use of costly emergency department care was a leading argument for passage of the law, but recent research has indicated increased use of those facilities after the Massachusetts' healthcare overhaul was implemented.

    “I suspect if it is an issue it will be dependent upon local resources—that there will be some communities where it is not a relevant issue and there will be other communities where it is a significant factor,” Dr. Andrew Ziskind, managing director for clinical solutions at Huron Consulting Group, said about continued emergency department crowding.

    In the states that opt to expand their Medicaid programs, providers anticipate a number of implementation steps that will impact them to varying degrees in the coming months and years. Key rules will implement the expansion of Medicaid and the modernization of the Medicaid eligibility and enrollment systems.

    For instance, providers will be watching as closely as states for expected federal guidance on the benchmark benefits that the law requires Medicaid programs to offer to their new enrollees. The benefits and services it covers are likely to differ from the standard benefits many Medicaid plans have offered their enrollees and those differences could affect the providers who care for them.

    Meanwhile, the legal certainty that now exists after the high court's ruling means that states no longer have a reason to hold back on certain provisions—namely the state insurance marketplaces. But they now face a tighter deadline to meet requirements.

    In six months, states must show legal authority to proceed with an exchange; hire the personnel to staff the exchange; and develop the information system requirements that will allow exchanges to take in information and distribute it to the public in a way that will allow them to make informed decisions, according to Joel Michaels, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery.

    The day after the court decision, HHS announced it would make more funding available to build state-based health insurance exchanges. It said it would provide states with 10 additional opportunities to apply for funding to set up state-based exchanges, state partnership exchanges or to prepare state systems for a federally facilitated exchange. Obama administration officials said they would continue to work with states wherever they are in the exchange process and noted that some are ahead while others are behind. To date, the federal government has distributed $850 million toward exchange building.

    For the Medicare program, the decision means continuing implementation of the many provisions that the law established, such as phasing in coverage in the Medicare Part D drug benefit coverage gap, or “doughnut hole”; reducing federal payments to Medicare Advantage plans over time and providing bonus payments to plans that receive high-quality ratings; continuing to reduce annual payment updates to providers (other than physicians); and making adjustments for productivity improvements.

    “Medicare spending will grow relatively slower in the next decade than it has in previous years because the law includes significant savings to the program,” Tricia Neuman, senior vice president and director of the Kaiser Family Foundation's program on Medicare policy, told Modern Healthcare. “This had the effect of sustaining the life of the trust fund.”

    The $155 billion in reduced payments over 10 years that hospitals accepted under the law from Medicare and Medicaid includes $36 billion from disproportionate-share hospital payments—special funds hospitals are given to treat a higher-than-average number of indigent patients—and $112 billion from yearly reductions to the hospital. Those reductions to Medicare and Medicaid payments are expected to be offset over the long term by sharp increases in the share of patients having insurance, as provided by the new health reforms.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing