"The law is broken once they tell a lie," Trammell said.
He explained that Janssen was ordered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue a letter to doctors correcting an earlier letter saying the drug didn't increase the risk of developing diabetes.
Janssen attorney James Simpson argued that neither McDaniel's office nor the state Medicaid office issued any warning to doctors that Risperdal carried greater risks than believed. He also noted that even after the lawsuit was filed, the state continued to pay for Risperdal prescriptions.
"That doesn't make any sense," Simpson said. "They never restricted a single ... Risperdal prescription."
Simpson also questioned why the state didn't have any testimony from doctors complaining about how the company disclosed the drug's side effects.
Trammell said any action the state did or did not take regarding Risperdal wasn't a concern for the jury. He said it is up to drug companies to notify doctors of any problems with a medication and that companies are obligated to act before the FDA gets involved.
"You have to ring the bell. You have to tell the public," Trammell said.
He cited instances in which patients gained 60 or 100 pounds, leading to diabetes.
Trammell said the rural nature of Arkansas makes it more important for drug companies to keep doctors informed. People outside of cities often rely on primary care doctors rather than specialists, he said, and non-specialists in mental health were prescribing the drug without knowing the full range of side effects.
Arkansas' lawsuit was one of dozens of state and federal cases accusing Janssen of fraud connected with Risperdal. In January, Janssen settled with Texas for $158 million in a similar suit. Texas sought damages of about $1 billion.
Simpson and co-counsel Laura Smith played up their Arkansas ties, with Simpson saying he gets chills when the University of Arkansas cheerleaders run on the field. Smith told the panel that she has lived in Arkansas for all of her 60 years.
Simpson pointed out that McDaniel's office relied on an out-of-state law firm to handle the case, a move McDaniel has previously defended by saying it was appropriate to seek help from outside specialists.
Jurors had a set of 10 questions to decide—five regarding Janssen and five nearly identical ones regarding its Johnson & Johnson parent company. The jury ruled in favor of the state on all 10 questions. Only nine votes were needed to reach a decision on any question.