A federal jury in Texas ordered Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary to pay $482 million in damages to an inventor who claimed the healthcare giant infringed on his patent for a cardiac stent.
Johnson & Johnson to pay doc $482 million in stent patent suit
Jurors hearing the case in the U.S. District Court in Marshall, Texas, deliberated for two hours Friday before returning the verdict against Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp.
The dispute centered over Cordis' Cypher drug-eluting stents, which release a drug to help keep arteries from becoming blocked.
Bruce Saffran, a doctor from Princeton, N.J., sued the two companies in 2007, claiming the Cypher stents infringed on his 1997 patent covering technology to deliver injury-healing medication inside the body. Jurors concluded that Saffran proved that the Cypher stents infringed on his patent and that Johnson & Johnson and Cordis did so willfully — opening the door for the court to potentially triple the amount of damages.
Cordis officials said the company is "disappointed" with the jury's ruling.
"The company believes this is contrary to both the law and the facts set forward in the case. We will ask the judge to overturn this verdict and if unsuccessful, we plan to appeal the verdict," Cordis spokeswoman Sandra Pound said in a statement.
In 2008, another federal jury in Marshall awarded Saffran a $431.9 million patent infringement judgment against Boston Scientific Corp. U.S. District Judge T. John Ward later raised the amount to $501 million. The company agreed in 2009 to pay $50 million to settle the dispute.
Send us a letter
Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.