A senior U.S. envoy accused Iranian leaders of hypocrisy Wednesday for opting to pursue "ever more dangerous nuclear technology" instead of accepting an international plan to make sure that medical isotopes get to needy Iranian cancer patients.
U.S. envoy says Iran's nuclear policy endangers its cancer patients
The sharp criticism from Glyn Davies, the chief U.S. delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency, came a day after Iran began enriching its uranium to a higher level, increasing international concerns about its nuclear aims.
Tehran says it wants to enrich only up to 20% — substantially below the 90%-plus level used in the fissile core of nuclear warheads — as a part of a plan to fuel its research reactor that provides medical isotopes to hundreds of thousands of Iranians undergoing cancer treatment.
But the West says Tehran is not capable of turning the material into the fuel rods needed by the reactor. Instead it fears that Iran wants to enrich the uranium to make nuclear weapons.
The move is viewed with concern internationally because it would create material that could then be processed into weapons-grade uranium more quickly and with less effort than Iran's present stockpile of 3.5% enriched uranium.
"Why is Tehran gambling with the health and lives of 850,000 Iranian cancer patients in pursuit of ever more dangerous nuclear technology?" Davies asked.
"This move is callous and chilling," he told the Associated Press.
Washington on Wednesday imposed new sanctions on several affiliates of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps over their alleged involvement in producing and spreading weapons of mass destruction.
The Treasury Department announced that it would freeze assets in U.S. jurisdictions of Revolutionary Guard Gen. Rostam Qasemi and four subsidiaries of a construction firm that he commands that were hit with U.S. sanctions in 2007.
The sanctions expand existing U.S. unilateral penalties against elements of the Guard Corps, which Western intelligence believes is spearheading Iran's nuclear and missile programs.
David Albright of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security said higher enrichment means Iran is getting a step closer to the ability to make nuclear weapons.
"Iran is slowly expanding its breakout capability," Albright said in an e-mail to the AP. He said achieving the 20% level "would be going most of the rest of the way to weapon-grade uranium."
Western powers blame Iran for rejecting an internationally endorsed plan to export its enriched uranium, enrich the material further and return it in the form of fuel rods for the reactor — and in broader terms for turning down other overtures meant to diminish concerns about its nuclear agenda.
Iran, in turn, asserts it had no choice but to start enriching to higher levels because its suggested modifications to the plan were rejected.
That plan was welcomed because it would have delayed Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon by shipping out about 70% of its low-enriched uranium stockpile. Tehran denies nuclear weapons ambitions, insisting it needs to enrich to create fuel for an envisioned nuclear reactor network.
The proposal was endorsed by the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — the six powers that originally elicited a tentative approval from Iran in landmark talks last fall. Since then, however, mixed messages from Tehran have infuriated the U.S. and its European allies, who claim Iran is only stalling for time as it attempts to build a nuclear weapon.
On Wednesday, Iranian Vice President Ali Akhbar Salehi said the process of higher enrichment was going smoothly while insisting that Iran was ready to stop any time it received the needed amount of 20% enriched uranium from abroad.
France and the U.S. have said Iran's action left no choice but to push harder for a fourth set of U.N. Security Council sanctions to punish Iran's nuclear defiance. Russia, which has close ties to Iran and has opposed new sanctions, appeared to edge closer to Washington's position, with senior officials saying the new enrichment plans show the suspicions about Iran's intentions are well-founded.
Italy stepped up the call for U.N. sanctions on Wednesday, with Foreign Minister Franco Frattini telling news media he thought the European Union was united on the issue.
The wild card remains China, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council that can veto any attempts to impose a fourth set of U.N. sanctions on Tehran for its nuclear defiance. Its officials continue to oppose new U.N. penalties on Iran, a key supplier of Beijing's energy needs.
Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's chief delegate to the IAEA, urged the West to "refrain from any language or threat and ... sanctions," on the sidelines of Tehran's presentation of its domestically produced Omid telecommunications satellite at Vienna's U.N. complex.
Beyond the nuclear issue, Iran's human rights record was also being criticized.
In Geneva, a senior U.S. State Department official, John Limbert, urged a U.N. rights body to shine a light on Tehran's mistreatment of prisoners, its repression of protesters and its imprisonment of journalists and intellectuals.
Limbert was among dozens of Americans held captive in Iran during its Islamic revolution in 1979-1980.
Send us a letter
Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.