Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Accreditation
February 29, 2020 01:00 AM

Accreditors defend consulting practices amid CMS reform plans

Maria Castellucci
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    CMS Administrator Seema Verma
    AP

    CMS Administrator Seema Verma said it’s “a glaring conflict of interest” when accreditors act as consultants to their clients.

    In response to potential plans by the CMS to limit the consulting relationships they can have with provider customers, accreditation organizations are defending the arrangements.

    CMS Administrator Seema Verma didn’t mince words last week during a speech at the agency’s Quality Conference in Baltimore when she said it’s “a glaring conflict of interest” when accreditors act as consultants to their clients.

    The CMS currently has a proposed rule under review by the Office of Management and Budget in response to its request for information in December 2018 asking for feedback from accreditors regarding protocols for establishing and disclosing relationships with providers they both sell consulting services to and accredit for participation in Medicare.

    The Joint Commission, which is the leading accreditor of hospitals, once again defended its business framework of acting as both an accreditor and consultant in response to Verma’s comments. A “robust” firewall maintains the integrity of the accreditation process, a spokeswoman at the Joint Commission said in a statement. She added that the association submitted comments to the agency explaining “the value” of their consulting services when the RFI was issued.

    Organizationally, the accreditation arm is a separate legal entity from its consultancy arm, called Joint Commission Resources. The consultancy division also doesn’t allow its surveyors to be consultants. Furthermore, it doesn’t provide consultants with any information that isn’t public nor train them on how to interpret Joint Commission standards. Instead, consultants rely on the detailed surveys that surveyors leave with their hospital clients. Finally, consultants can’t help customers appeal survey findings, be in contact with a customer during a survey or be on site when surveyors are present.

    Despite this, it does appear the Joint Commission benefits financially from having a consultancy arm. The Joint Commission was contractually set to receive $6.5 million in 2017 in fees for shared services and $1.2 million in royalties from Joint Commission Resources, according to the two organizations’ IRS Form 990s filed on GuideStar. The Joint Commission received $18.8 million in total that year from JCR.

    A Joint Commission spokeswoman said it’s “dangerously inaccurate” to say it receives money from JCR. The $18.8 million from JCR was reimbursement for expenses the Joint Commission had previously paid on their behalf, she said.

    While the American Hospital Association, which has a representative on the Joint Commission board, defends the arrangement, the Federation of American Hospitals appears to be open to changes. In response to the RFI, the investor-owned hospital association said, “Anything that may undermine the integrity of accreditation programs or the public trust in CMS-accredited providers and suppliers must be considered and addressed.”

    The Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality, which accredits roughly 100 hospitals in the U.S. and offers consultancy services to hospitals it doesn’t accredit, is mainly concerned that the CMS’ proposed rule may no longer allow them to offer customers educational tools and support to help them meet Medicare’s conditions of participation.

    CIHQ, along with many other accreditors, helps explain to provider organizations how to interpret standards and offers strategies about how to appropriately meet them. Accreditors argue this is different from consultancy because it’s a more hands-off approach that doesn’t involve an individual working with a hospital to fix specific issues at that facility or to help implement programs.

    “The concern I have, and many of my colleagues share, is that if the CMS takes an overly broad interpretation of what consulting means then we are going to be prohibited from doing things that are educational in nature, supportive in nature, that really help hospitals better comply with the standards,” said Richard Curtis, CEO of CIHQ.

    Consumer advocates have a different view. Leah Binder, CEO of the Leapfrog Group, said the relationships accreditors have with customers do appear to have a conflict of interest.

    “We are really relying on accreditors to be tough and accurate, often that is the only surveillance that a hospital gets in a given year,” she said. “If there is anything that is going to compromise that, or appear to compromise that, we do have a problem.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    hospital room - surgery
    Joint Commission makes major revisions to quality, safety standards
    Joint Commission to accredit VA clinical labs
    Joint Commission to accredit VA clinical labs
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing