A new analysis suggests that smart design of the websites used for the new state insurance exchanges to enroll consumers in health plans could save consumers and the government more than $9 billion a year.
It highlights the difficulty for consumers of choosing a health plan that best fits their healthcare and financial circumstances even in the new reform environment where they can more easily make apples-to-apples comparisons.
Read more »
Lee
Some of California’s top insurers, including Kaiser Permanente, are protesting the state’s plans to drop quality ratings from insurance listings when its exchange goes public on Oct. 1.
Covered California executive director Peter Lee told the Los Angeles Times that the data behind existing quality ratings were too out of date. He also fears the plans sold on the exchanges will be very different from the individual policies that formed the basis for the star-based grades (this is movie-land).
Read more »
The not-for-profit group responsible for educating Americans about the healthcare reform law's coverage options provided a status check of its efforts on Monday, but remained vague about how much it is spending on the massive endeavor.
Throughout 2014, Enroll America will spend “tens of millions” of dollars on the “Get Covered” campaign that it launched in late June, Anne Filipic, the group's president, told reporters in a phone call.
Read more »
It's more those smoking breaks than healthcare costs that make smokers more expensive employees.
A new analysis by researchers at Ohio State University found that employees who smoke cost private employers $5,816 more a year than nonsmoking employees. Much of the cost, about $3,077, came in lost time from smoking breaks.
Read more »
Boehner
The New York Times ran a quietly subversive news story Wednesday about how members of Congress and their aides will receive health coverage under the Office of Personnel Management's new proposed rule interpreting a controversial Obamacare provision.
During the drafting of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), an opponent of the legislation, insisted that members of Congress and their staffers should have to buy their coverage from the state health insurance exchanges the same way millions of other Americans would get it—rather than getting it through the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program as they do now. It was a commendable idea that few members of Congress probably thought through.
Read more »
Fledgling accountable care organizations have faced plenty of challenges. Now a group of economists and lawyers are calling for a close look at issues involving insurance, antitrust and other regulation to avoid “unintended consequences.”
Health policy experts Gary Bacher, Michael Chernew, Daniel Kessler and Stephen Weiner write in the latest issue of the policy journal Health Affairs that ACOs could stifle competition among insurers and providers and potentially drive up prices.
Read more »
A patient engagement and reporting program linked to financial incentives yielded multiple improvements in health measures for employees of UnitedHealth Group, according to a study published in the August issue of Health Affairs.
UnitedHealth employees enrolled in the health insurance company's Rewards for Health program were able to earn points good for premium reductions as high as $1,200 for family coverage. The rewards program used health screenings targeting diabetes, cancer and other diseases as well as more general weight control based on the worker's body mass index.
Read more »
Joint replacement prices at the most costly California hospitals plunged by one-third after the state required its workers and retirees to pay out of pocket all costs above a “reference price” of $30,000 for orthopedic surgery, a new study said.
The average cost of joint replacement among high-priced hospitals dropped to $28,465 after the California Public Employees' Retirement System made the change in 2011, wrote University of California researchers James Robinson and Timothy Brown in the journal Health Affairs. That's down from $43,308 the prior year.
Read more »
Supporters of the healthcare reform law got some good news from a survey just released by the healthcare policy briefing website The Morning Consult.
Nearly half of registered voters polled in the survey—47%—said they would be less likely to vote for a member of Congress in 2014 if the member tried to defund Obamacare as part of a federal budget package, compared with 28% who said they would be more likely to vote for the member.
Read more »
The Obama administration's recent decision to delay the 2010 healthcare reform law's employer mandate by a year is estimated to increase the law's net cost to the federal government by $12 billion over 10 years, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation announced Tuesday. A relatively modest cost increase was predicted when the mandate delay was announced.
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) had requested that the CBO and JCT assess the effects of the July decision to postpone for one year the law's provision that employers provide insurance to their workers or else pay a penalty. In a six-page report, the CBO noted that its May 2013 baseline projections had estimated the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's insurance provisions would cost the federal government about $1.36 billion between 2014 and 2023. After the Treasury department's recent announcement, the CBO recalculated those projections and now estimates the insurance coverage measures in the law will cost the federal government about $1.375 billion over that same 10-year period.
Read more »
The Obama administration's recent decision to delay the 2010 healthcare reform law's employer mandate by a year is estimated to increase the law's net cost to the federal government by $12 billion over 10 years, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation announced Tuesday. A relatively modest cost increase was predicted when the mandate delay was announced.
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) had requested that the CBO and JCT assess the effects of the July decision to postpone for one year the law's provision that employers provide insurance to their workers or else pay a penalty. In a six-page report, the CBO noted that its May 2013 baseline projections had estimated the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's insurance provisions would cost the federal government about $1.36 billion between 2014 and 2023. After the Treasury department's recent announcement, the CBO recalculated those projections and now estimates the insurance coverage measures in the law will cost the federal government about $1.375 billion over that same 10-year period.
Read more »
