<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><nitf baselang="en-US">	<head>		<docdata management-status="usable">			<date.release norm="20130121T000100-05000" />		</docdata>	</head>	<body>		<body.head>			<hedline>
			</hedline>
			<byline>By Modern Healthcare</byline>			<abstract></abstract>		</body.head>		<body.content>									<block><![CDATA[<p>Joe Carlson's article "Safe at home" understates the number of direct-care workers in the home-care industry. He cites a government source, which tracks home health aides but does not include personal-care aides. Today's home-care workforce is more than double Carlson's estimate, or 2.5 million workers. That includes 924,650 home health aides, 820,600 personal-care aides and 800,000 independent providers employed in public programs. Personal-care aides top the list of fastest-growing occupations in the nation this decade.</p>]]></block><block><![CDATA[<p>Yet there are no federal training standards for personal-care aides. And a recent Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute analysis found that 23 states have at least one publicly funded personal assistance program with no training requirements for personal-care staff.</p><p>Federally mandated criminal background checks may help screen out disreputable people in the rapidly growing home-care field, but federal training standards and well-designed recruitment practices for personal-care aides would do much more to ensure that consumers receive quality care.</p><p><p><i>Jodi Sturgeon</p><p>President, Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute, New York</i></p>]]></block><block><![CDATA[<p><p><i></p><p></i></p>]]></block>			</body.content>		<body.end>			<tagline typ="std" />		</body.end>	</body></nitf>