Join, Follow & Connect
Join Modern Healthcare's LinkedIn group Follow Modern Healthcare on Twitter Join Modern Healthcare's Facebook group Follow Modern Healthcare's Pinterest board Modern Healthcare's Flickr page Modern Healthcare's YouTube Channel Get a Modern Healthcare news feed

 
Comment Buy Reprints Print Article Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email this page to a colleague
Healthcare Business News
 

Congress kills voluntary long-term-care program


By Jerry Geisel, Crain's Business Insurance
Posted: January 3, 2013 - 3:30 pm ET
Tags:

President Barack Obama on Wednesday signed legislation that ends a healthcare reform law provision that would have established a voluntary long-term-care program.

Under the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports program, participants would have paid a monthly premium for five years, after which they would have become eligible for a cash benefit of at least $50 a day that could be used to offset the cost of long-term care services.

The law directed the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services secretary to establish automatic enrollment procedures that employers could have used, forcing employees to opt out if they didn't want to participate.

Advertisement | View Media Kit

 

Earlier, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the administration would not implement the program. Because the program was voluntary, critics said it would have resulted in adverse selection, a point Ms. Sebelius conceded.

“This could have led to a vicious cycle where premiums would have to be set higher and higher to cover the likely costs of the benefits, leading fewer and fewer healthier people to sign up for the program,” she said.

However, HHS lacked the authority to formally kill the program, leaving it to Congress to take such action.

The elimination of the long-term care program is the third time a health care reform law provision has been repealed.

In 2011, Congress — without administration objections — repealed two health care reform law provisions. One would have required employers to offer lower-paid employees company-paid vouchers to purchase coverage in state health insurance exchanges if their required premium contribution toward employer coverage exceeded a certain percentage of their income. The other would have required employers to distribute Form 1099 statements to any vendor with which it did at least $600 in business.


What do you think?

Share your opinion. Send a letter to the Editor or Post a comment below.

Post a comment

Loading Comments Loading comments...

Search ModernHealthcare.com:


 

Switch to the new Modern Healthcare Daily News app

For the best experience of ModernHealthcare.com on your iPad, switch to the new Modern Healthcare app — it's optimized for your device but there is no need to download.