Feedback Form
Join, Follow & Connect
Join Modern Healthcare's LinkedIn group Follow Modern Healthcare on Twitter Join Modern Healthcare's Facebook group Follow Modern Healthcare's Pinterest board Modern Healthcare's Flickr page Modern Healthcare's YouTube Channel Get a Modern Healthcare news feed
 

Of Interest

How healthcare providers make, spend, borrow and invest money.
Comment Buy Reprints Print Article Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
By Melanie Evans

Blog: Fee-for-service: A rash that just won't go away

Pay doctors to churn through patients, procedures and tests, and they will. As a business model, “do more, earn more” has been singled out by policymakers and the industry as deeply flawed and one reason the U.S. spends so much on healthcare.

But, as two health policy experts point out in the Aug. 8 Journal of the American Medical Association, efforts to find another way—including accountable care—have so far produced little change.

Payment for each procedure or visit continues to underpin many emerging accountable-care organizations, including Medicare's popular shared savings program, wrote Drs. Allan Goroll of Harvard University Medical School and Stephen Schoenbaum of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.

“The concern is that continued reliance on fee-for-service payment for primary care as well as for specialists, with its emphasis on volume of services, threatens meaningful practice transformation and the very goals of delivery system reform,” the physicians said.

Goroll, who also lectures and consults on primary care reform, and Schoenbaum argue that inertia, vested interest and skepticism are “major barriers” to payment reform. Fee-for-service payments are well-established and providers have developed lucrative business practices under the model, they wrote. Some may recall “unsatisfactory experiences” with managed care and capitation. And new models require risk. “Transitioning to a new payment system will require new modes of practice, and many physicians feel ill equipped to assume financial or performance risks individually or even collectively,” they wrote.

So what's the industry to do?

It must develop “robust, scientifically validated risk-adjustment models,” Goroll and Schoenbaum said. Payment reform could also start with a mix of capitation and fee-for-service with a plan to adjust the payments over time, they recommend.

Do you agree that new payment models can be cured of fee-for-service? Or, is it a chronic disease that will live on despite the industry's best efforts to eradicate it? Drop me a line at mailto:mevans@modernhealthcare.com and let me know what you think.

You can follow Melanie Evans on Twitter: @MHmevans.

Comment Buy Reprints Print Article Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

What do you think?

Share your opinion. Send a letter to the Editor or Post a comment below.

Post a comment

Loading Comments Loading comments...






Search ModernHealthcare.com:



Daily Dose MH Alert MH AM HITS Modern Physician Most Requested

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Flickr News Feeds Google Plus Page - Publisher

 

Switch to the new Modern Healthcare Daily News app

For the best experience of ModernHealthcare.com on your iPad, switch to the new Modern Healthcare app — it's optimized for your device but there is no need to download.