Feedback Form
Join, Follow & Connect
Join Modern Healthcare's LinkedIn group Follow Modern Healthcare on Twitter Join Modern Healthcare's Facebook group Join Modern Healthcare's Flickr group Get a Modern Healthcare news feed
 
 
Comment Buy Reprints Print Article Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email this page to a colleague
Healthcare Business News
 

Cost implications need to be spelled out


Posted: August 11, 2009 - 12:00 pm ET
Tags:

After reading the article “One-day stays a big reason for excess pay to hospitals, RAC project finds,” if I were a consumer of services, I would want to know specifically the criterion for determining either hospital admission or outpatient procedure determination. If I had to pay a percentage of the insurance cost—say 20%—this could be substantial given the figures posted for the cardiac procedures.

Advertisement | View Media Kit

 

As an educated healthcare consumer, I would want to know my options, and what the risks are for choosing an outpatient venue vs. what are the risks or justification for an inpatient admission. It seems clear to me that the choice should be outpatient status. Of course there would be the “facility fee” charge add-on, which could raise the fee by up to $2,000 that should be examined and disclosed to the consumer in determination of the procedure cost. The physician should make it clear to the consumer what the status is of the procedure as to in-patient or outpatient, and how Medicare reimburses as either Part A or Part B claims.

Kristina Port
Port-Able Services
Novelty, Ohio

Comment on today's news or other matters. Submit your comments to the Daily Dialogue at dailydose@modernhealthcare.com. Submissions must include name, title, affiliation, city and state. Modern Healthcare reserves the right to edit all submissions.


Search ModernHealthcare.com:



Daily Dose MH Alert MH AM HITS Modern Physician Most Requested Advance Notice

LinkedIn Amazon Kindle Twitter Facebook Flickr News Feeds